The California legislature advanced four clean energy bills to floor votes and held a smart meter data access bill in committee, PV Magazine reported.
One of the surviving measures, Senate Bill 868 from Senator Scott Wiener, clears regulatory hurdles for plug-in balcony solar systems up to 1,200 W. Plug-in units of that size sit at the small end of the distributed solar market and have faced permitting and interconnection friction that the bill targets directly.
Assembly Bill 1813 cleared the Senate Appropriations Committee. It directs regulators to value community solar and storage using the Avoided Cost Calculator maintained by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). Tying compensation to that calculator replaces bespoke program pricing with the same avoided-cost methodology the CPUC already applies elsewhere, and it sets the economics for community solar projects that have struggled to reach financial close in the state.
Senate Bill 913, authored by Sen. Josh Becker, requires the CPUC to establish a valuation framework for behind-the-meter battery storage systems that export energy to the grid during peak stress. That places a compensation obligation on the regulator rather than leaving export value to utility tariff design, and it applies to residential and commercial batteries already installed behind customer meters.
The casualty was Assembly Bill 1787, which failed to pass out of the Senate Appropriations Committee. The bill would have required utilities to provide real-time smart meter data access to consumers. Real-time interval data is the input layer for virtual power plant dispatch and for third-party load management products, so its failure leaves the aggregation bills advancing without the customer-side data mandate that would have supported them.
The package moves against a backdrop of California electricity rates doubling over the past decade. Rate pressure is the political fuel behind measures that let customers self-supply or sell power back, and it also frames the counterargument utilities and ratepayer advocates raise about cost shifts between participating and non-participating customers.
The Avoided Cost Calculator referenced in AB 1813 is the CPUC's standing tool for pricing distributed resources against what the grid would otherwise spend on generation, capacity, and transmission. Applying it to community solar and storage means project revenue tracks a regulatory model rather than a legislated fixed rate, which shifts the negotiation from the statehouse to the commission's periodic updates of that model.
SB 913 and AB 1813 both hand implementation to the CPUC. Neither bill sets the numbers itself. The commission proceedings that follow will determine whether behind-the-meter export payments and community solar values are high enough to move projects, and that is where the substance of the legislative session will land.
Balcony solar, by contrast, is a permitting question rather than a compensation one. SB 868 addresses the regulatory barriers to plug-in systems at or below 1,200 W, a category aimed at renters and apartment residents who cannot install roof-mounted arrays. The bill does not create a payment mechanism for those systems.
All four surviving bills still require floor votes.