The Amsterdam District Court on June 3 rejected Energy Transfer's preliminary request to dismiss Greenpeace International's lawsuit, rejecting the company's argument that the court lacks jurisdiction, according to Inside Climate News.
The ruling allows the case to move forward even as the court sided with Energy Transfer on one point. According to Inside Climate News, the court found that the 2024 EU anti-SLAPP directive does not apply because the Netherlands has not yet implemented it through national legislation.
Greenpeace International sued Energy Transfer in Amsterdam District Court in February 2025, invoking a newly adopted EU directive intended to protect EU citizens from abusive lawsuits or SLAPPs, according to Inside Climate News.
The suit followed a separate case in the United States. According to Inside Climate News, on March 19, 2025, a North Dakota jury handed down a damage award of nearly $667 million against three Greenpeace entities over their alleged role in the Standing Rock protests.
In February, the trial court cut the initial award in half, to $345 million, of which Greenpeace International would be liable for about $65 million, according to Inside Climate News.
The two proceedings now run in parallel. Patrick Parenteau, emeritus professor of law at Vermont Law and Graduate School, said the parallel litigation is uncharted territory and the two courts may produce conflicting rulings, according to Inside Climate News.
The dispute traces to the pipeline route. According to Inside Climate News, the Dakota Access Pipeline runs 1,172 miles and was rerouted around Bismarck to cross within a mile of the Standing Rock Sioux reservation and beneath Lake Oahe.